COVER STORY, SEPTEMBER 2007
LEADER OF THE PACK
Austin leads the state, and the nation, in sustainable design. Lindsey Walker
It’s no big surprise that green building and sustainable design are catching on around the world due to diminishing natural resources and increasing energy costs. However, some areas are applying these practices more quickly than others. Texas cities such as Austin — and Dallas, San Antonio and Houston to an increasing degree — are proving that implementing smart building concepts in commercial real estate isn’t just better for the environment, it’s better for the owners’ wallets.
Upfront Costs, Long-term Savings
Green building has a long list of pros, the obvious ones being that there is less environmental impact and it is socially responsible. But, in addition, buildings that follow sustainable design guidelines have improved indoor air quality, use less energy, provide a healthier working and/or living environment for tenants, and cost owners less money in the long run.
With all of the known advantages of sustainable design, why aren’t all builders rushing to convert?
When many builders think about green design, they picture the upfront costs — buying more efficient (and expensive) products, investing in better water and waste management systems and so on. What they don’t see is the light at the end of the tunnel, which, according to Michael McElhaney of Jackson & McElhaney Architects in Austin, is “the payback by energy savings and the longer life cycle of the building and its components.”
Lars Stanley of Stanley Architects in Austin agrees. “Typical builders and buyers are not well-informed of the long-term cost benefits of sustainable design,” he says. “But, once they become informed, they realize that it makes sense to build this way.”
The reason it makes sense is simple: even though the upfront costs are more for green building than traditional building, the savings in the long-term outweigh any money lost in the beginning, according to Gary Olp of GGO Architects in Dallas. “It’s proven that long-term these buildings do cost less,” Olp says. “They don’t require the same sort of maintenance and they are saving energy.”
However, as much as it all adds up, switching over to green building isn’t cut-and-dry. Texas, along with the rest of the country, is working from a centuries-old model that doesn’t always synch up to new ways of thinking. As Alan Richards, an associate with Corgan Associates in Dallas, puts it, “there is an inherent struggle between the initial cost of LEED strategies and the financial lease model.”
Olp gives an example of two speculative industrial buildings going up across the street from each other, one is being built to LEED standards while the other is following traditional building methods. “The guy who builds the green building and it costs him a few bucks more, his rent is a little more than his competitor, so he’s not going to do it,” Olp says. “The problem is that our standards for all conventional construction are so low that unless it all comes up together, [change] is not going to happen.”
Austin — Ahead of the Curve
Austin, however, is one Texas city that has made a decision to challenge the status quo and is a national leader in sustainable design.
One great resource Austin has to offer is the Austin Energy’s Green Building Program, which prides itself on being the “most successful utility-sponsored sustainable building program in the nation,” according to McElhaney. “With its structured system of consulting, worksheets and rating system, this program not only quantifies the level of green building but also educates and promotes further learning in the field of sustainable design. We have also found it helpful to use its rating tool as a guideline even when designing buildings outside of Austin.”
Stanley also notes that the Austin Energy program will fund most of the costs of building photovoltaic systems — the use of photovoltaic cells to directly convert sunlight into electricity — for a residence. “It is an offer too attractice too refuse, but most folks are unaware of it,” Stanley says.
One example of a green project in Austin is Legacy Town Lake, a 31-story residential development underway in downtown. The project is being designed by Houston-based EDI Architecture.
“We have made a commitment to advocate green building on all of our residential and hospitality projects,” says Brit Perkins with EDI Architecture. “In addition, the city of Austin requires projects located in the central business district to attain certain green building requirements, so we are leveraging that requirement to go ahead and seek LEED accreditation.”
Legacy Town Lake boasts green features such as low VOC interior finishes, high-efficiency cooling systems, high-performance glazing systems, operable windows, programmable thermostats, a smoke-free interior environment and easy-access to public transportation.
A Greener Future?
While the rest of the state isn’t quite as progressive at Austin, overall, Texas is in the top 10 states for LEED registered projects, according to the U.S. Green Building Council’s numbers. “Cities like Dallas, Houston and San Antonio are beginning to adopt green standards and initiatives, but the private sectors are not yet as much involved,” Richards says.
With the inherent financial and societal challenges involved with green building, what will it take for the country’s builders to finally switch over? In a few words, depleting resources.
“Green design is the only nearly realistic option for the future,” says Stanley. “With the impact of the peaking production and availability of oil, all aspects of modern society will have to drastically adapt to more limited resources, and the sooner the better. If the industry can realize and adapt to this reality, it will be better able to thrive and create alternate approaches that can be profitable.”
McElhaney agrees. “More and more incentives like tax rebates, construction rebates and low interest loans are emerging and helping to boost this portion of the industry,” he says. “Not only do I feel that it is the desired direction for the building industry, I feel that it is the required direction. With our limited resources, both the built and natural landscape will change — hopefully with everyone’s efforts — for the better.”
PRODUCT SPOTLIGHT: V-KOOL SPECTRALLY SELECTIVE APPLIED FILM
Q&A with V-Kool president and CEO Marty Watts.
TREB: Describe your product, V-Kool.
Watts: Conventional applied window film was invented in the 1960s to block solar heat from overheating buildings whose window glass was not designed to block solar heat from the sun. Too much solar heat resulted in the need to use more air conditioning. Often, in new construction today, heat-blocking glass will be used; however, for the majority of existing buildings with overheating problems, an applied heat-blocking window film is much less expensive than replacing all of the original glass.
The problem with conventional tinted and reflective applied window film is that it also blocks a great deal of visible light. Blocking visible light creates the need for increased interior illumination, which can increase utility costs. In addition, denying building occupants natural light reduces their productivity and negatively impacts health and well-being, according to numerous studies conducted by government agencies and universities over the past 20 years. Worse yet, tinted and reflective film also changes the appearance of building exteriors.
The challenge for the window film industry was to develop a clear, transparent, colorless film that blocks heat as well as or better than tinted and reflective films. Such films are called spectrally selective because they selectively block heat while simultaneously transmitting visible light.
The first of these spectrally selective films appeared on the market in the mid-1990s based on low emissivity (the ability to emit heat) coatings technology developed for glass (as in Low-E glass).
Spectrally selective film is designed to be used on any structure (home, retail, office building, hospital and so on) in which overheating from too much solar energy is a problem. Because true spectrally selective film such as V-Kool is clear and transparent, it can be used only on those windows of a home or building in which overheating is a problem whereas a tinted conventional film would have to be used on all of a structure’s windows in order to maintain a uniform exterior appearance.
TREB: How does it contribute to sustainable design and building practices?
Watts: The weak link in the building envelope is glass both in terms of blocking unwanted solar energy, which contributes to air conditioning operating cost, and insulating against heat loss during heating season.
Applied window film is designed to deal with solar overheating in terms of reducing air conditioning operating cost and often eliminating the need to upgrade and expand HVAC systems. Spectrally selective film, by enhancing natural daylighting, reduces the need for both additional lighting and often the need for daylighting controls and systems as well.
Since heat often contributes to off gassing of building components and furnishings as well as mold growth when interior humidity is high, heat-blocking window film used in conjunction with HVAC can improve indoor air quality without totally relying on constant, 24/7 HVAC operation.
TREB: Is there anything else like it on the market right now?
Watts: Several window film manufacturers call their film spectrally selective. The definitive test is how much visible light does a film transmit? Most so-called spectrally selective films transmit no more than 54 percent of visible light. V-Kool 70 transmits 70 percent of visible light. Films that transmit less than 70 percent are visible on the window. If a window film looks tinted and not clear it is not optimally selective in the all-important category of visible light transmission.
— Lindsey Walker |
Five reasons sustainable building is more cost-effective than traditional building
1. Lowers the overall cost of operations
2. Saves on tax dollars for energy consumption
3. Attracts more residents and businesses
4. Saves on capital construction
5. Variety of global environmental benefits
Source: DMR Architects |
Humphreys & Partners Architects’ Newest Design Concept Promotes Efficiency by Creating More Value in the Same Amount of Space
Dallas-based Humphrey & Partners Architects — best known for its innovative Big House design — is at it again with its newest multifamily concept, e-Urban infill design. Using 20 percent less materials to house the same number of people, e-Urban upholds green design thought as well as provides huge dollar savings to building owners.
“The most interesting thing about the e-Urban design is that the building is much more efficient while using the same amount of materials and square footage,” says Mark Humphreys, CEO of Humphreys & Partners Architects. “Basically, if you’re building a 200-unit apartment project at about 200,000 square feet, it’s going to cost you approximately $20 million. With this design, you could potentially save $4 million in construction costs.”
This is made possible by taking away large common area and corridor spaces. The concept behind the design is a four- or five-story, wood-frame building that utilizes a number of smaller, separate elevator lobbies that open up to five or six apartment doors, as opposed to the traditional large lobbies on each floor that have long corridors and dozens, even hundreds, of apartment doors.
“With this design, there are 70 percent less corridors and common areas — that’s 70 percent less space that needs to be lighted, heated and air-conditioned,” Humphreys says.
Humphreys & Partners came up with this notion in response to the rising construction costs, which, according to Humphreys, have been going up about 1 percent a month — totaling 24 or 25 percent in the last few years — and were causing the firm’s buildings to barely function financially.
“That was our first concern,” Humphreys says. “We also noticed that the efficiency of these buildings was only 65 percent — and not just ours, so were everybody else’s.”
Humphreys went to his firm’s design department and asked them to work on a design that would get the efficiency up higher, and they did that by eliminating the corridors and creating elevator lobbies. This new concept took it from 65 percent to 88 percent efficiency (efficiency meaning rentable or sellable area versus common area), he says.
“This has been very exciting to a lot of our clientele,” Humphreys says. “We’ve had over 150 phone calls in six weeks. It’s been a bigger reception that we received on our Big House product for which we’re well-known.”
Humphreys & Partners currently is working on approximately 30 projects with e-Urban infill design, several of which are located throughout Texas.
“We pride ourselves on coming up with new products that the market does not have. We felt there was a need for this, and it turned out we found the solution,” Humphreys says. “We have met with some of the largest developers in the U.S. already on this product, and they’ve looked at the design and said it was remarkable. It’s very simple; it’s amazing nobody has thought of this before.”
— Lindsey Walker |
BUILDING A GREEN COMMUNITY FROM THE GROUND UP
Mueller Airport project is a model of sustainable design. Matt Whelan
|
The redevelopment of the former Robert Mueller Municipal Airport in Austin, Texas, is incorporating sustainable development practices such as the recycling of construction materials, the employment of non-toxic finishes and energy-efficient lighting systems.
|
|
The city of Austin, Texas, is widely recognized as one of the country’s capitals of green building.
So it’s no surprise that at the largest real estate project in Austin history — the redevelopment of the former Robert Mueller Municipal Airport — the best practices of sustainable development are being incorporated into every single home, office, storefront and civic building in the community.
The city of Austin and its utilities have worked with local developers to make this new mixed-use urban village a showpiece of what is being called Green Urbanism. Public support for the idea has been intense, and ambitious environmental design goals and objectives have been built into the project’s award-winning masterplan and design book.
Today, real estate companies involved with Mueller are working to exceed those goals and demonstrate how green building principles can be applied on a community-wide basis to make Mueller a model for future development.
Specifics vary by building type, but the design techniques being incorporated at Mueller include virtually all hallmarks of sustainable development. Builders are recycling construction materials and employing non-toxic finishes. Structures feature natural light and ventilation. Lighting systems are energy efficient. Inside plumbing fixtures and exterior landscaping are designed to significantly reduce water consumption over time.
Furthermore, all buildings at Mueller have to earn at least a two-star rating (or for single-family homes a three-star rating) in Austin Energy’s Green Building Program, one of the nation’s pioneering programs and a key influence on the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED programs. A two-star rating basically corresponds to a national LEED certification.
Given that Mueller’s 711 acres will, at full buildout, be home to more than 4,600 housing units and nearly 5 million square feet of commercial space, these green building standards in themselves make a huge impact on urban and regional sustainability.
But Austin’s residents and businesses have shown they are able and willing to go further. Individual homebuyers are working with our homebuilders to upgrade to state-of-the-art green building amenities. Commercial projects have exceeded the plan’s requirements and are eligible for premium levels of LEED certification. Indeed, Mueller’s first big employment anchor — the new Dell Children’s Medical Center of Central Texas — is seeking LEED Platinum status, the first hospital in the U.S. to attain this benchmark.
These individual green-built projects would be less impressive and effective if they were set in a traditional development pattern that encouraged auto use, threatened surface and groundwater resources, or had other characteristics of sprawl. The Green Urbanism concept for Mueller tackles those issues head-on with community-wide sustainability features embedded in the master plan.
The location itself — an urban infill site only minutes from Austin’s downtown — does a great deal to reduce auto travel and takes advantage of existing infrastructure. The Mueller community vision builds on these advantages by incorporating bus and future rail transit and encouraging walking and bicycling, with dedicated walkways and bike paths along every street and trails throughout the development.
Much of the new street infrastructure on-site includes recycled material from the former airport runways. As for utility infrastructure, Mueller is served by the Austin Water Utility’s initial reclaimed-water system, allowing the use of recycled greywater for irrigation and other non-potable uses. And Austin Energy has constructed an innovative, self-contained energy-efficient mini-plant to provide power, heating and cooling to the Dell Children’s campus.
More than 20 percent of the Mueller site is being developed as public parks and green space, with the planting of 15,000 trees, including many mature specimens preserved both on-site and from other development sites in the area. Mueller parkland also features low-water-use native plantscapes designed in partnership with the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center. The Mueller design standards also call for one tree for every four parking spaces in the surface lots of our retail center and future town center, which will diminish urban heat island effects as well as make these spaces more walkable.
Even the public art at Mueller conveys the environmental message. At the main gateway to Mueller’s retail center along Interstate 35, a series of 16-foot-tall “SunFlowers,” sculptures built as solar collectors, will produce their own energy.
The people of Austin, and the builders serving them, have come together as willing partners in making Mueller a living sourcebook of good ideas and proven best practices for sustainability. With luck, the high environmental standards being set at Mueller can be adapted by other builders to make any new project — from a single home to an entire new town — more sustainable and more successful.
— Matt Whelan is senior vice president at Catellus Development Group, master developer of the Mueller project. |
©2007 France Publications, Inc. Duplication
or reproduction of this article not permitted without authorization
from France Publications, Inc. For information on reprints of
this article contact Barbara
Sherer at (630) 554-6054.
|